Pd Parisi Amp039change Name Precious Provocation But Everything Depends On The Projectamp039

Rome, January 23, (Adnkronos) - "It is undoubtedly helpful to talk about it, so the provocations of those who ask us to change it are priceless. Arturo Parisi responds to Adnkronos on the issue of changing the name of the Democratic Party by saying, "If we think with Dante that names are consequent to present things or projects, everything depends on the thing or project evoked.".

"Considering that the national constituent assembly and Congress are depicted in outline form, with the New Democratic Party written in all capital letters on all sides, it can be said that the revival of art has given the movement a new beginning. In relation to the secessionists, it would be more than beneficial in that particular way.

According to what I have specifically heard respected members of the Bersani and D'Alema party say, says Parisi. In actuality, a new name represents the closing of the parenthesis begun in 2007 and the desire to relaunch with greater vigor in a different direction.

The former minister goes on to say: "The specification then with the replacement or addition of new letters to that simple D, given that with the shared emphasis on the role of the parties, it seems to me to exclude the disappearance of the P, it seems to me to represent the abandonment of the choice of addressing the majority of Italians, as broad as possible, in favor of a more recognizable proposal profiled in terms of social class and ideological references. PdL or PdS are names that would both work from this perspective.

It's unfortunate that the first was already squandered by Berlusconi and that the second was exhausted and abandoned in a different season. (Adnkronos) - But what do you personally believe? "Unfortunately, the answer is clear.

It is the same one I gave just 23 years ago today—or what feels like yesterday—when, in my capacity as the Democratic Party's leader during the DS Congress's gathering at the Lingotto, I suggested to Veltroni that the two of us discuss the formation of the Democratic Party. Unfortunately, this proposal was unsuccessful. Additionally, it is the same response that we and Prodi gave to Rutelli and Di Pietro the previous year in order to defend the Pd as everyone's name by simply referring to the Movement as "the Democrats" and operating under the slogan "Kicking donkey had taken the field against the anti-olive prejudice that had been the basis of the D'Alema government," according to Parisi.

When asked which name should be used in place of the one associated with the former Pd project, he responds, "If and which name should replace the one linked to the old Pd project is one of the choices, I would say the first, which only the voters can and must give at the time of those impending primaries that we call Congress. The ability of each candidate to express himself clearly and loudly is therefore more than just useful; it is also required in order to allow this choice.

By highlighting the connection between the name and the thing, rather than relying solely on electoral marketing arguments. whether fresh or seasoned.

What purpose serves a Congress if not to make clear the meanings behind the excessive number of words that have been used since September 25th?. "Letta emphasized this point repeatedly.

"We don't need a new secretary; we need a new party," was the statement made. Who more than the voters can decide whether and what it is, and what better than the name can this novelty say?" says Parisi in his conclusion.

The ability of each candidate to express himself clearly and loudly is therefore more than just useful; it is also required in order to allow this choice. By highlighting the connection between the name and the thing, rather than relying solely on electoral marketing arguments.

whether fresh or seasoned. What purpose serves a Congress if not to make clear the meanings behind the excessive number of words that have been used since September 25th?.

"Letta emphasized this point repeatedly. "We don't need a new secretary; we need a new party," was the statement made.

What better than the name can this novelty say? Who more than the voters can decide whether and what it is?" concludes Parisi. The ability of each candidate to express himself clearly and loudly is therefore more than just useful; it is also required in order to allow this choice.

By highlighting the connection between the name and the thing, rather than relying solely on electoral marketing arguments. whether fresh or seasoned.

What purpose serves a Congress if not to make clear the meanings behind the excessive number of words that have been used since September 25th?. "Letta emphasized this point repeatedly.